|
Work And Pensions
Select Committee Inquiry Into Tackling Pensioner
Poverty
Response From Dr. Ros Altmann, Independent Pensions
Policy Expert
by Dr. Ros
Altmann
(All material on this
page is subject to copyright and must not be
reproduced without the author's
permission.)
-
What more does DWP need to do to address
pensioner poverty? Are there specific groups who
are more vulnerable to facing poverty in old
age?
The Government's main policy for addressing
pensioner poverty has been via pension credit.
This does not actually deal properly with the
problem due to low levels of take-up. The take-up
problems are a function of many factors,
including older people not wanting to tell the
'authorities' all about their income,
pride, lack of awareness and the complexity of
the system. Groups at risk are those who live
alone, or are infirm but struggling to manage on
their own, perhaps those who cannot read. Older
single female pensioners are particularly at
risk, but newly retired males or females who have
become unwell and don't know how to claim
their entitlements are also extremely
vulnerable.
Government needs to radically reform the system,
to ensure that pensioner poverty is properly
tackled. The simplest, most reliable, fairest and
most comprehensive way to do this is to pay a
flat-rate resident's pension to all those
over age 70 or 75, above the pension credit
level. Say £140pw. In order to do this, it
would be possible to redeploy existing spending
on pensions to cover the costs - and of course
there would be significant administrative cost
savings from ending the means test for most older
people (defining old as over 70 or 75). Those
younger pensioners who need it could still claim
pension credit as now, but older people would not
need to do so, they would be paid as of right.
Around half of pensioners are entitled anyway, it
can be taxed back from higher income groups and
this would finally end the means test and poverty
for almost all older people, be properly fair to
women and other groups who are let down by the
gaps in the national insurance system.
-
-
Impact of the financial crisis on
pensioner poverty - for example on savings income
and on older people nearing
retirement.
The financial crisis has already had and will
continue to have a very negative impact on
pensioners and will worsen pensioner poverty.
Policy for the crisis - including bringing down
interest rates - has almost entirely ignored the
plight of older people, indeed aggressive
interest rate cuts are little different from
cutting the state pension. A pensioner with
£10,000 of savings will have lost
£10pw as a result of falling rates. Those
coming up to retirement are finding the value of
their pension savings has plummeted and the cost
of buying an annuity has increased, so the
pension they were expecting is simply not there
for them. Many pensioners are struggling to make
ends meet as savings income falls and are cutting
back on their spending. Official statistics show
that 9 million pensioners in 2007 received
investment income, they will all have lost out.
The inflation rate they face, meanwhile, has
continued to soar, so in real terms they are
considerably worse off. Food and drink inflation
is still over 10%, household expenses inflation
is over 14%, council tax keeps rising, which will
all mean more pensioners in poverty. Pension
credit still assumes that poorest pensioners are
earning over 10% interest on any savings above
£6,000. They are not earning anything like
that amount, so their pension credit savings
credit is far less than it should be if the 10%
assumption had been revised to reflect the new
reality.
Is "lifestyling" enough to
mitigate the effects?
Lifestyling may mitigate the effects of stock
market falls, but is a blunt instrument which may
not work and has not prevented most pension funds
from losing money. Some lifestyle funds switched
into corporate bonds, rather than gilts, whose
value has also fallen. Anyway, many pensioners
are in balanced or managed funds without
lifestyling, so they have suffered the full force
of the falls.
What is the potential impact of the
financial crisis on annuity rates?
Annuity rates will worsen as gilt yields fall and
insurers struggle to back annuity books with
safer assets. Insurers have lost heavily on the
bank bonds and asset backed securities they
bought, instead of gilts. Also, as more defined
benefit schemes close, bulk annuity deals will
worsen annuity rates for individual annuity
purchasers over time.
How will the financial crisis impact
upon the numbers of pension credit
claims?
It is inevitable that the loss of private pension
income will lead to an increase in those eligible
for pension credit. Not all of them will claim,
but the number of claimants is likely to rise as
people retire without much other income apart
from their state pension.
-
-
Benefits take-up - why do some people not
take up their entitlement to benefits (e.g.
Pension Credit, Housing Benefit, Council Tax
Benefit) and how can take up rates be
improved?
Many older people are too proud to claim, or do
not like having to tell the authorities about
every aspect of their finances, or are unaware of
their entitlements. The system is hugely complex
so that most people do not understand it.
-
-
Basic State Pension - will the 2010
changes create a fairer state pension
system?
The system will be slightly fairer, but still
won't be fair.
-
-
no comment
-
-
Are lump sum payments, such as the Winter
Fuel Payment, an appropriate way of addressing
pensioner poverty?
Gimmicks such as winter fuel payments do not
address pensioner poverty properly at all. Even
those who live in Spain all winter or those who
are very well off and therefore do not need these
payments, can receive them. Such universal
benefits do not help poorer pensioners
specifically, they are available to everyone.
They cost over £2billion a year and the
money would be better spent improving the state
pension
-
-
Is the Government's programme of
welfare reform the right approach for supporting
pensioners who wish to continue
working?
No, Government policy desperately needs to
encourage older workers to stay in the labour
force, but policy is acting as a barrier instead.
Age discrimination legislation stops at age 65
and the pension credit earnings disregard is
still just £5pw, so that poorer and older
workers can be penalized by policy decisions
which count against them. This must change as
soon as possible.
-
|