back
Why
are many SME’s not providing pensions?
by
Dr. Ros Altmann
(All
material on this page is subject to copyright and must not be reproduced
without the author's permission.)
PENSIONS
SEEN AS A COMPANY COST, NOT A COMPANY BENEFIT – SME’s
DON’T WANT TO PROVIDE PENSIONS ANY MORE
The latest research from the Pensions Institute shows that Finance
Directors in smaller and medium size companies (SME’s) do
not want to provide pensions for their workforce any more. This
confirms the crisis engulfing pensions and confirms that millions
of workers’ future incomes are in jeopardy. Government policy
on pensions has succeeded in undermining future pension provision,
by introducing major new disincentives for UK employers and employees.
SME’s, employing 11 million people, now consider pensions
an unnecessary expense. Alan Johnson and Malcolm Wicks both told
the Labour Party conference that there is no pensions crisis. Only
those who are unable to look into the future could believe this.
Yes, the UK has built up a strong retirement savings culture. This
is now crumbling away before our eyes.
Employers
in smaller businesses now see pensions as a company cost, not a
company benefit. Their employees do not value the pension contributions
made on their behalf, as confidence in pensions has plummeted.
Government
must urgently address this. Just saying there is no crisis is burying
their heads in the sand. The disincentives of means testing must
be removed. At the moment, pensions are not ‘suitable’
investments for the majority of British workers, since they face
the risk of losing at least 40p of each £1 of their pensions
due to the means test of Pension Credit. The regulatory regime is
another huge obstacle to pensions for the mass market. Costs and
constraints on promoting or advising on pensions have effectively
locked lower earners out of the best deals and out of the advice
process altogether. Government pensions policy has not focussed
on the realities of the marketplace. If employers do not want to
pay the costs of providing pensions and employees do not want to
engage in this process due to lack of confidence, the future is
bleak indeed. In this environment, auto-enrolment will not work,
since Finance Directors would find ways of putting up barriers to
avoid having to contribute to pensions. For example, they could
impose high minimum levels of employee contribution, encourage presentations
that focus on the risks of pensions and means testing and provide
easy opt-out forms.
If
Government seriously wants to ensure more pension provision, rather
than less, it is also imperative to introduce proper incentives,
for both individuals and employers to contribute to pensions. Not
one of the Government’s policy initiatives has introduced
measures to encourage those who were not providing pensions for
average earners before, to do so in future.
The
Pensions Institute research is a damning indictment of Government
policy. It provides clear evidence that pension provision for the
stakeholder target group will fall, not rise, if policy is not changed.
The nation as a whole will be the poorer for this and the sooner
policy makers realise what is happening out there, the better for
all of us.
back
|