Government considering savings incentives for social care

by Dr. Ros Altmann

(All material on this page is subject to copyright and must not be reproduced without the author's permission.)



Possible ways to incentivise care saving schemes: 

1. Care ISA 2. Tax free pension withdrawal 3. Care saving in auto-enrolment

Could help millions of middle income families not just the well-off


Government must tackle lack of care funding:  Are Ministers finally waking up to the need to help people save to pay for social care?  I do hope so.  It seems they may be considering savings incentives, to help people prepare for potential care bills for themselves or their loved ones. Estimates suggest that around half the population over age 65 will need to spend at least £20,000 on later life care, and one in ten will spend over £100,000. 


Insurance unlikely, need to encourage savings:  Insurance companies cannot offer an insurance solution to cover care costs, so private savings must form part of the solution.  With an aging population and rising longevity, it has long been clear that increasing numbers of older people will need care.  Yet there is no money set aside by the state or in private savings to cover care costs.  Obviously, using a family home is a possibility, but many would prefer other means.


Care ISAs and tax free pension withdrawal could help kick-start care savings culture:  How can we help families start to plan care savings?  Tax-free ISAs are simple and popular form, but most people do not have specific spending plans for their ISA.  A ‘CareISA’ in the Chancellor’s final Budget would not involve upfront tax relief as with pensions.  Launching a CareISA specifically earmarked to pay for care would itself help people realise the need to save for care and help kick-start a care saving culture that currently does not exist.  In addition, allowing people to spend their pension money on care without paying tax first would also encourage more to keep money for later life as well as signalling the need for care saving plans.


Making a CareISA work – IHT free?  A separate annual allowance for a ‘Care ISA’ of perhaps £10,000 a year, maybe with a lifetime maximum of £100,000 contributions could be announced by the Chancellor.  Transferring money from other ISAs into a CareISA would also be allowed.  The money could only be spent on approved care provision (but it could cover care for a loved one as well as paying for moderate or preventive needs because such early intervention might help save money to the NHS).  To increase the attraction of CareISAs they should be exempt from inheritance tax.  Just as with pensions, they could then be passed on to future generations as a Care Savings plan.  This could finally begin the process of planning in advance for care funding.  Within any one couple, there is a 50/50 chance that one will need care, in a family of four, one is likely to need care but no money is set aside.  Saving among family members would make sense if they wanted to, rather than each individual.


Tax free pension withdrawal to pay for care:  Alongside a new Care ISA, the new pension freedoms could also be used to encourage people to save money for later life care by allowing any money taken out of the fund for care needs to be withdrawn tax-free.  Removing the annuity requirement and 55% death tax could encourage pension funds to be kept to cover family care costs.  Allowing some pension fund withdrawal to be tax free if it is used to pay for care, would encourage more people to retain some funds in the tax-free pension for longer, just in case it is needed.  If they don’t spend it on care, it will pass free of inheritance tax to the next generation.


Auto-enrolment to encourage workplace care saving plans:  Ultimately, there is another route to help care funding, especially for those without large savings.  We certainly need a range of options to solve a crisis on this scale.  With auto-enrolment potentially bringing every worker into pensions for the first time, there is an opportunity to use this to start funding social care too.  The Government could eventually adjust auto-enrolment to cover more than pensions, or even build a national care insurance contribution into auto-enrolment too. 


Bringing Care Savings into workplace flexible benefits packages:  In the meantime, there would be merit in encouraging employers to offer workplace savings plans specifically for care, such as the CareISAs.  This could be part of a flexible benefits package, with an employer contribution to help workers of all ages and income levels save up for care costs.


No magic silver bullet – urgently need range of options so public know they need to save:  The cost to society of failing to ensure money is set aside for future social care needs w

ill put intolerable burdens on the NHS, on younger generations and on older people.  There is no magic silver bullet to solve this crisis – we’ve left it so late.  The best we can do is start to tell people that the state won’t pay, help them realise just how little the state covers and that they are likely to need their own funding as well.  Whether it’s ISAs, pensions or auto-enrolment, the Government must incentivise saving for social care and this can ultimately help millions of middle-income families, not just those who are well off.

 

ENDS


Note for Editors:

  1. There are currently no incentives to help people save for care. There are huge incentives for pension savings, but nothing at all for long-term care that so many pensioners will actually need.
  2. Families only find out at the point of need how inadequate the current care system really is.  Social care services, left to cash-strapped councils, have been cut to the bone.  Local authorities now refuse any help until your needs are really substantial, so having money to pay for a bit of care before that can improve quality of life and often keep older people from suffering avoidable accidents. 
  3. Many of us have life insurance when we are younger, just in case something happens, because we want to know our family will be provided for.  Saving to pay for care is a similar principle.  If you suddenly become unable to look after yourself – or if this happens to one of your loved ones such as a parent or partner – having a pot of money saved up for care will mean you don’t need to worry about how to fund what you need.  Of course, the cost of life insurance is usually much less than care costs, but the principle is similar and families should have the chance to prepare.  Until they know they need to, this is unlikely to start.
  4. Understandably, most of us don’t want to think about frailty and care needs, but the ostrich approach will not solve the problems.  And, of course, care is not just about old people, it touches families and loved ones but unfortunately, most of us have no idea we need to think about it until it happens to us. 
  5. Don’t think the NHS will pay, because many aspects of later life illness (including dementia) do not usually qualify as health issues and public funding for care is subject to a strict means test.  Indeed, even with state funding, if you want care sooner or of higher quality, you will need to find your own money.  Most people have no idea just how inadequate state social care funding can be – most of us would want money to spend on care well before the state steps in, and even with state funding many would want more than the state allows  - either longer homecare visits, or better quality care home.

© Dr. Ros Altmann  |  Home  |  Profile  |  Disclaimer